Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900
96 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38


96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- n/ag - 106 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009

Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Canon SX220 HS and Sony T900, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Sony. The image resolution of the SX220 HS (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

The SX220 HS was released 24 months after the T900 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX220 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SX220 HS grades against the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon SX220 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX220 HS Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX220 HS over the Sony T900
SX220 HS | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Canon SX220 HS
T900 | SX220 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX220 HS and Sony T900
SX220 HS | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX220 HS comes with outside dimensions of 106mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX220 HS and Sony T900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SX220 HS vs the T900.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX220 HS and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX220 HS and T900.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you should expect comparable quality of files though you should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more modern SX220 HS should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX220 HS vs Sony T900 Specifications
Canon SX220 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon SX220 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-02-07 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II TG TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30,120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 143g (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 59 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/ MMCplus/HC MMCplus | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $399 | $300 |