Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500
54 Imaging
43 Features
60 Overall
49
61 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Announced April 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/7000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1104mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the XC10 (12MP) and Fujifilm S8500 (16MP) and the XC10 (1") and Fujifilm S8500 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XC10 was brought out 2 years later than the Fujifilm S8500 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the XC10 matches up versus the Fujifilm S8500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon XC10 and Fujifilm FinePix S8500. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon XC10 Gallery and Fujifilm S8500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Fujifilm S8500
| XC10 | Fujifilm S8500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 | January 2013 | Fresher by 28 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8500 over the Canon XC10
| Fujifilm S8500 | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k | 1k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Fujifilm S8500
| XC10 | Fujifilm S8500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon XC10 features external measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8500 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Compare the Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the XC10 compared to the Fujifilm S8500.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and Fujifilm S8500 is 54 and 61 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XC10 and Fujifilm S8500.
Plainly, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XC10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm S8500 will produce extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger XC10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon XC10 vs Fujifilm S8500 Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Fujifilm FinePix S8500 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-04-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC DV5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 20000 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 160 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 24-1104mm (46.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 0cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/7000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.8fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | XF-AVC, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040 gr (2.29 lb) | 670 gr (1.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LP-E6N | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,599 | $500 |