Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
54 Imaging
43 Features
60 Overall
49
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Revealed April 2015
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon XC10 and Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is fairly close but the XC10 (1") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe XC10 was launched 5 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XC10 grades vs the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon XC10 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon XC10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| XC10 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 | July 2009 | Fresher by 70 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Canon XC10
| GR Digital III | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 1k | Sharper display (+919k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| XC10 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon XC10 offers external dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") along with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon XC10 and Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the XC10 vs the GR Digital III.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XC10 and GR Digital III is 54 and 92 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XC10 and GR Digital III.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XC10 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Canon XC10 will render more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher XC10 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-04-08 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC DV5 | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 122.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 20000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 160 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | XF-AVC, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040 grams (2.29 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LP-E6N | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $1,599 | $399 |