Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Revealed April 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the XC10 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the XC10 (1") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XC10 was manufactured 2 months later than the WG-5 GPS so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the XC10 matches up versus the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon XC10 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Canon XC10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| XC10 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Canon XC10
| WG-5 GPS | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| XC10 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | February 2015 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Canon XC10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") having a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XC10 compared to the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and WG-5 GPS is 54 and 90 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XC10 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XC10 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will give you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2015-04-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC DV5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 122.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 20000 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 160 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.8 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | XF-AVC, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040 grams (2.29 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E6N | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,599 | $500 |
