Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b251/8b2512ffe152268e9dc73c343f6dd23f5eae1e82" alt="Canon XC10 front Canon XC10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched but the XC10 (1") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The XC10 was introduced 7 months after the WG-M1 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the XC10 grades against the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Canon XC10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
XC10 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2015 | ![]() | September 2014 | More modern by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon XC10
WG-M1 | XC10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 115k | ![]() | 1k | Clearer display (+114k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-M1
XC10 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon XC10 offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Canon XC10 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the XC10 and the WG-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f11f/3f11f2a68780aa31df286b78e89231aa547a444d" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and WG-M1 is 54 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37930/37930969580f139d9287f15dd07e06362bb24e7d" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XC10 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XC10 with its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will give you more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent XC10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f74e5/f74e500fa4ced68fb35aa12315a215596ef1526b" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison"
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91241/91241ada07af192928f618b115b388dc80a69db1" alt="Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Canon XC10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon XC10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-04-08 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC DV5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 20000 | 800 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
Screen resolution | 1k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | XF-AVC, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1040g (2.29 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E6N | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,599 | $2,000 |