Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively close but the XC10 (1") and HZ35W (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XC10 was revealed 4 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the XC10 grades against the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon XC10 and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Canon XC10 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Samsung HZ35W
| XC10 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Canon XC10
| HZ35W | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+613k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Samsung HZ35W
| XC10 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon XC10 comes with outside measurements of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") along with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the XC10 compared to the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XC10 and HZ35W is 54 and 91 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The image below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XC10 and HZ35W.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XC10 features the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining bokeh simpler. The more modern XC10 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Other name | - | WB650 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-04-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC DV5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 122.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 20000 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.8 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | XF-AVC, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040g (2.29 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LP-E6N | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $1,599 | $300 |