Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ50W
54 Imaging
43 Features
60 Overall
49
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Additionally Known as WB5500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ50W: A Detailed Camera Comparison for Enthusiast Photographers in 2024
Selecting the perfect camera can feel overwhelming given the dynamic array of technologies and design philosophies manufacturers deploy. Today, we take an expert look at two distinct cameras that target different creative niches yet might appeal to a similar group of enthusiast photographers: the Canon XC10, launched in 2015, and the Samsung HZ50W (also known as WB5500), introduced in 2010.
We'll explore how these models stack up across key photographic scenarios - portrait to travel, wildlife to video - while peeling back the layers of their technical DNA. Our goal is to help you understand which camera better suits your creative ambitions and shooting style. Let's dive in with a thoughtful, hands-on comparison based on real-world experience and meticulous technical evaluation.
A Quick Side-by-Side Overview
Before digging deeper, here’s a succinct specs and features comparison overview:
| Feature | Canon XC10 | Samsung HZ50W |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | April 2015 | May 2010 |
| Camera Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom Bridge |
| Sensor | 1" CMOS, 12MP | 1/2.3" CCD, 14MP |
| Lens | Fixed 24-241mm (10x), f/2.8-5.6 | Fixed 26-676mm (26x), f/2.8-5.0 |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Autofocus | Contrast-detection, 9 focus points, face detection | Contrast-detection, center-weighted AF |
| Video | 4K UHD @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps | 720p HD @ 30fps |
| Screen | 3" Tilting Touchscreen, 1MP | 3" Fixed, 230K dots, no touch |
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Weight | 1040 g | 426 g |
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | 125 × 102 × 122 mm | 116 × 83 × 91 mm |
| Storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) | SD/SDHC, Internal (1 slot) |
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi | None |
| Price (at launch) | ~$1600 | ~$250 |

This size comparison immediately reveals the XC10’s substantial build relative to the more compact, lightweight HZ50W.
Design, Build, and Ergonomics: Handling Matters
What You’ll Feel in Your Hands
The Canon XC10 is a large sensor compact with a professional, sturdy feel. Weighing just over 1 kg and sporting a hefty handgrip, it feels balanced especially when paired with its fixed lens. You benefit from an effectively designed control scheme despite the absence of an EVF. The Sony DIGIC DV5 processor also supports snappy operation and enables advanced video features.
In contrast, the Samsung HZ50W embraces the bridge-style body form familiar to many photography enthusiasts, offering a small, manageable, and lightweight package at 426 g. The compactness makes it exceptionally portable and suitable for casual outings where lugging heavier gear might not be ideal.
The built-in screen of the XC10 tilts and supports touch - enhancing usability in varied shooting positions - whereas the HZ50W sports a fixed, non-touch LCD with lower resolution. This difference affects menu navigation and framing versatility.

Control Layout Insights
Looking down at both cameras, the XC10 provides dedicated controls for manual exposure, focus modes, and quick access buttons for video - a nod to the hybrid shooter. The HZ50W has a simpler dial layout with fewer dedicated buttons but still valuable for amateurs wanting straightforward operation.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
At the heart of every camera lies its sensor. This fundamentally shapes how your images look regarding dynamic range, color fidelity, low-light performance, and detail.
Canon XC10’s 1" CMOS Sensor
- Size: 12.8 x 9.6 mm, area ~123 mm²
- Resolution: 12 MP
- Aspect Ratios: 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 supported
- Sensor Type: CMOS (favorable for better noise control and fast readout)
- ISO Range: 160–20,000 native ISO
- No Raw Capture: Only JPEG available
While 12 MP may feel modest compared to modern cameras boasting 20+ MP, the sensor size and technology favor superior image clarity especially in mixed lighting – a sweet spot between compact cameras and larger mirrorless bodies.
The absence of raw support can limit post-processing latitude, but Canon’s XF-AVC and H.264 codecs bolster video fidelity considerably.
Samsung HZ50W’s Smaller 1/2.3" CCD Sensor
- Size: 6.08 x 4.56 mm, area ~28 mm²
- Resolution: 14 MP
- Aspect Ratios: 4:3, 16:9
- Sensor Type: CCD (traditional for compact cameras but slower and noisier at high ISOs)
- ISO Range: 64–3200 native, 6400 boost
- Supports Raw
The smaller sensor constrains dynamic range, noise performance, and detail resolution, most noticeable in challenging light or large prints.

Real-World Image Quality Takeaways
-
Portraits: The XC10’s larger sensor and superior optics yield creamier bokeh and more natural skin tones. Its 1" sensor coupled with f/2.8 wide-angle allows controlled depth-of-field that enhances subject isolation impressively. The HZ50W with its smaller sensor shows more depth-of-field, meaning less background blur - a common limitation in bridge cameras.
-
Landscape: Canon’s stronger dynamic range and decent resolution benefit landscapes and high-contrast scenes. Samsung’s sensor shows more noise and less shadow detail after post-processing.
-
Low Light & High ISO: The XC10’s ISO ceiling of 20,000 lets you push challenging conditions far better, though you will see noise at upper ranges. The HZ50W becomes noisy by ISO 800 and only moderately usable up to 3200.
Autofocus Performance and Usability
Canon XC10 Autofocus
- Contrast-detection AF
- 9 autofocus points with face detection
- Touch AF capability
- AF modes: single, continuous, tracking
- Good reliability for video and photo
While not on par with advanced phase detection mirrorless autofocus systems, the XC10’s implementation remains responsive for portraits, candid shots, and video focusing. Autofocus tracking works well in stable lighting, enabling smoother subject tracking.
Samsung HZ50W Autofocus
- Contrast-detection AF only
- Center-weighted AF area
- Lacks face or eye detection
- Only single AF mode
Its autofocus system is less advanced and slower to lock, which can be frustrating when photographing animals, children, or sports.
Lens Versatility: Focal Length and Aperture
- Canon XC10: Fixed zoom 24-241 mm equivalent, f/2.8-5.6
- Samsung HZ50W: Fixed zoom 26-676 mm equivalent, f/2.8-5.0
The XC10’s lens covers a wide-to-telephoto range of 10x with a slightly faster aperture at the wide end but tapers off compared to HZ50W on the tele-side, which offers 26x zoom reaching ultra-telephoto territory.
This means the HZ50W excels in wildlife or distant subjects, though with compromises due to sensor size and quality. The XC10’s shorter zoom and superior sensor make it better for portraits, landscapes, and video work demanding image quality.
Video Capabilities: Who Wins for Filmmakers?
One standout feature setting the Canon XC10 apart is its 4K UHD video recording at 30fps, alongside 1080p at up to 60fps, packaged in professional codecs (XF-AVC, H.264). The camera includes microphone and headphone jacks, facilitating external audio monitoring and recording - critical for quality video.
The Samsung HZ50W, meanwhile, maxes out at 720p HD video at 30fps, with no external microphone options. This restricts the camera’s appeal for serious video creators.
The XC10’s optical image stabilization, full manual exposure, and touch screen launching focusing in video mode add finesse to filmed content.
Still Photography Disciplines: How Each Model Excels
Portrait Photography
- Canon XC10: Soft bokeh and natural skin tones thanks to sensor size and lens speed; face detection aids sharp focus on eyes; tilting touchscreen enables imaginative low and high-angle framing.
- Samsung HZ50W: Limited background blur; modest face detection; fixed screen hampers shooting angle flexibility.
Landscape Photography
- Canon XC10: Great dynamic range and resolution make for sharp, detailed scenes; built-in Wi-Fi aids quick image transfer on location.
- Samsung HZ50W: Lower detail and dynamic range challenges; fuller zoom range less relevant to still landscapes; no weather sealing on either camera.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon XC10: Decent image stabilization but focal length limited; autofocus can struggle tracking very fast subjects.
- Samsung HZ50W: Superior reach at 676mm effective, though image quality trade-offs apparent; autofocus sluggish.
Sports Photography
- Neither camera is optimized for fast burst rates. XC10 offers 3.8 fps continuous shooting, HZ50W lacks burst data. Both have minor appeal here.
Street Photography
- Samsung HZ50W’s lighter, smaller size favors discreet shooting, though the slower autofocus may frustrate fast moments. The XC10’s larger size is more conspicuous but offers better image quality.
Macro Photography
- Canon’s 8cm minimum focus distance and 1" larger sensor provide more detailed close-ups with pleasant bokeh.
- Samsung’s 10cm minimum focus is respectable, but sensor and lens limitations impact fine detail and background separation.
Night and Astro
- XC10's higher ISO range and video capabilities make it a better choice for night shooters and astro enthusiasts, especially if you’re filming star trails or time lapses.
- Samsung’s higher noise above ISO 800 limits low-light use.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Battery Life
- Neither model offers weather sealing or ruggedized protections, so you’ll need to exercise care outdoors.
- The XC10’s larger battery (LP-E6N) supports substantial shooting sessions compared to the HZ50W’s smaller SLB-11A battery, which may limit longer outings.
- Both support single memory card slots; the XC10’s CFast option is faster but more expensive.
Connectivity and Interface
- Canon XC10 supports built-in Wi-Fi, enabling remote control and quick file sharing, a big plus for event photographers and vloggers.
- The Samsung HZ50W lacks wireless features, limiting modern connectivity.
- Both offer HDMI and USB 2.0 ports; however, only the XC10 has both microphone and headphone jacks, enhancing video shooting workflow.
- Touchscreen on XC10 simplifies menus and autofocus selection - a convenience absent on the HZ50W.

Sample Images: Exploring Quality and Clarity
Here are comparative images shot under controlled conditions showcasing sharpness, color rendering, and zoom performance.
- Look at the skin tone smoothness and bokeh rendition in the portrait crops - the XC10 handles these more naturally.
- In landscape shots, the XC10 provides richer shadow detail with less noise.
- Telephoto crops show Samsung’s reach but reveal softness and chromatic aberrations.
- Low-light samples emphasize the XC10’s advantage in noise suppression.
Overall Performance Scores and Genre-Specific Ratings
We synthesized extensive testing data to provide you with quantitative insights.
The Canon XC10 scores higher across the board in image quality, video capabilities, and autofocus responsiveness, while the Samsung HZ50W scores highest in zoom versatility and portability.
For portrait, landscape, night/astro, and video work, the XC10 leads. For wildlife telephoto reach and street photography ease, the HZ50W finds some strengths.
Who Should Consider Each Camera?
Why Choose the Canon XC10?
- You want a hybrid large sensor camera capable of excellent 4K video and solid still images.
- Video creators needing professional codecs, external audio, and stable footage.
- Enthusiasts who appreciate manual controls, comfortable ergonomics, and Wi-Fi transfer.
- Portrait and landscape painters seeking refined image quality with pleasing bokeh.
- You don’t mind the slightly heavier, bulkier body for extra capability and image fidelity.
Why Choose the Samsung HZ50W?
- You're on a tight budget (~$250 used market price) wanting a compact, easy, superzoom camera.
- You prioritize reach over image quality - favorite for casual wildlife or travel snapshots.
- You desire a bridge camera style with an electronic viewfinder.
- A lightweight, simpler interface is attractive for beginners or travelers.
- You can accept lower video specs and slower autofocus for affordability and zoom range.
Practical Buying Tips and Accessories to Explore
- If you pick the Canon XC10, invest in fast SD/CFast cards to handle 4K footage efficiently.
- Consider a sturdy tripod to leverage timelapse and night photography.
- Explore external mics and batteries to maximize video workflow.
- For Samsung HZ50W users, carrying extra batteries is advisable due to limited capacity.
- Use fast SD cards, though cost is lower due to less demanding formats.
Final Thoughts: Balancing Capability, Budget, and Creativity
Choosing between the Canon XC10 and Samsung HZ50W boils down to your creative priorities:
-
The Canon XC10 remains an impressive all-rounder for hybrid shooters chasing serious image and video quality in a single compact body. Its modern sensor, professional codec support, and tactile handling establish it well beyond its age for portraits, travel, video and nighttime use.
-
The Samsung HZ50W is a no-frills enthusiast superzoom with enormous reach and basic functionality suited to casual snapshots and nature telephoto pulls, especially if weight and budget are paramount.
With these insights grounded in hands-on testing and technical scrutiny, you can confidently align your choice with your visual ambitions. Whichever path you take, both cameras open doors to creative exploration.
Start your journey by checking out sample units if possible - see firsthand how each feels and shoots - and pair with lenses and accessories matching your style and goals. Happy shooting!
Canon XC10 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon XC10 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB5500 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-04-08 | 2010-05-03 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC DV5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 20000 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 2.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | XF-AVC, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1040 gr (2.29 lb) | 426 gr (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LP-E6N | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,599 | $250 |