Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 III was launched 5 years later than the E-M5 II and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the E-M5 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus E-M5 II
E-M1 III | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2015 | More recent by 62 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus E-M1 III
E-M5 II | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus E-M5 II
E-M1 III | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 1037k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III provides outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus E-M5 II has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 III and the E-M5 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/623c8/623c84c420a539db075de52e477ce3a3c4a67ca4" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and E-M5 II is 67 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16974/16974a61616492247498e6ab32d188290be9f7a8" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and E-M5 II.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M1 III to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66a64/66a649aa9c4549e34a44311b56fa025c6d334217" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce4e/7ce4e594020d44520e335d2f0ff578c8cf72b09b" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic IX | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 81 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 pounds) | 469 grams (1.03 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 896 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | 310 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,800 | $699 |