Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10
54 Imaging
43 Features
60 Overall
49
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Introduced April 2015
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Launched April 2010
- Replacement is Samsung NX11
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the NX10 (15MP) is very well matched but the XC10 (1") and NX10 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XC10 was unveiled 5 years later than the NX10 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung NX10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the XC10 matches up vs the NX10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon XC10 & Samsung NX10. The full galleries are available at Canon XC10 Gallery & Samsung NX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Samsung NX10
| XC10 | NX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 | April 2010 | More recent by 61 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX10 over the Canon XC10
| NX10 | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k | 1k | Sharper display (+613k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Samsung NX10
| XC10 | NX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon XC10 enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") having a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX10 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Compare the Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the XC10 and the NX10.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XC10 and NX10 is 54 and 80 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XC10 and NX10.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The XC10 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX10 will give more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer XC10 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon XC10 vs Samsung NX10 Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Samsung NX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Samsung NX10 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2015-04-08 | 2010-04-07 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC DV5 | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 20000 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.8 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | XF-AVC, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040 gr (2.29 lbs) | 499 gr (1.10 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 572 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E6N | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,599 | $626 |