Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Launched April 2015
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Photography Glossary Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XC10 (1") and SL202 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XC10 was released 6 years after the SL202 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XC10 scores vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon XC10 & Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are available at Canon XC10 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Samsung SL202
| XC10 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 75 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Canon XC10
| SL202 | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+229k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202
| XC10 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon XC10 has got external dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") and a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the XC10 against the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XC10 and SL202 is 54 and 94 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The image here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XC10 and SL202.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XC10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Canon XC10 will show more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern XC10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon XC10 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-04-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC DV5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 122.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 20000 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 2.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | XF-AVC, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1040 gr (2.29 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LP-E6N | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $1,599 | $140 |