Clicky

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
54
Imaging
44
Features
60
Overall
50
Canon XC10 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Canon XC10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 160 - 20000
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
  • Launched April 2015
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Also referred to as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the XC10 (1") and SL202 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The XC10 was released 6 years after the SL202 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XC10 scores vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Samsung SL202

 XC10 SL202 
ReleasedApril 2015February 2009More modern by 75 months
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Canon XC10

 SL202 XC10 
Screen resolution230k1kSharper screen (+229k dot)

Common features in the Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202

 XC10 SL202 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon XC10 has got external dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") and a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check the Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the XC10 against the SL202.

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XC10 and SL202 is 54 and 94 respectively.

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The image here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XC10 and SL202.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XC10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Canon XC10 will show more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern XC10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon XC10 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography highlights
50
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (1")
includes face detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not have RAW support
25
has face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon XC10 Street photography information
Samsung SL202 Street photography information
56
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
includes touch to focus
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition (1,040 grams)
47
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon XC10
Sports photography with Samsung SL202
47
has image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
includes tracking focus
max fps low (3.8 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Travel photography camera
43
includes touch to focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
more heavy than competition (1,040 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
57
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon XC10 Landscape photography advice
Samsung SL202 Landscape photography advice
50
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not have RAW support
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon XC10 Vlogging information
Samsung SL202 Vlogging information
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has microphone jack
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition (1,040 grams)
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
has face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon XC10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon XC10 and Samsung SL202
 Canon XC10Samsung SL202
General Information
Make Canon Samsung
Model type Canon XC10 Samsung SL202
Also referred to as - PL50
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2015-04-08 2009-02-17
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC DV5 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 12.8 x 9.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 122.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 20000 1600
Min native ISO 160 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-241mm (10.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 8cm 5cm
Crop factor 2.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.8fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.60 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video file format XF-AVC, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 1040 gr (2.29 pounds) 168 gr (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LP-E6N SLB-10A
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $1,599 $140