Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350
54 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b251/8b2512ffe152268e9dc73c343f6dd23f5eae1e82" alt="Canon XC10 front Canon XC10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Introduced April 2015
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Canon XC10 and Samsung TL350, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively similar but the XC10 (1") and TL350 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XC10 was manufactured 5 years after the TL350 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL350 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the XC10 scores vs the TL350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon XC10 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are available at Canon XC10 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Samsung TL350
XC10 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 63 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Canon XC10
TL350 | XC10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 1k | Sharper screen (+919k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Samsung TL350
XC10 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon XC10 enjoys outside dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") and a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Canon XC10 and Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the XC10 vs the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95ed8/95ed8ea07a4fc796354f9ac4d82a2e6564eea8c7" alt="Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XC10 and TL350 is 54 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84653/84653ce9f2cec401bae3cde67b1cc49c19b74bb7" alt="Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The image below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XC10 and TL350.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XC10 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Canon XC10 will offer more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern XC10 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc084/dc08445b9ffbc99d13b2e7faa29fb9b62771dabb" alt="Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cb3d/3cb3d1209c21c3b8b6acf41018769e1049825f6e" alt="Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon XC10 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Canon XC10 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon XC10 | Samsung TL350 |
Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-04-08 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC DV5 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 122.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 20000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 2.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | XF-AVC, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1040g (2.29 lb) | 195g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LP-E6N | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,599 | $400 |