Clicky

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000

Portability
54
Imaging
44
Features
60
Overall
50
Canon XC10 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Canon XC10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 160 - 20000
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
  • Announced April 2015
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Overview

In this write-up, we are analyzing the Canon XC10 and Sony S2000, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Sony. The image resolution of the XC10 (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the XC10 (1") and S2000 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XC10 was introduced 5 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the XC10 matches up versus the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Sony S2000

 XC10 S2000 
RevealedApril 2015January 2010Fresher by 64 months
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Canon XC10

 S2000 XC10 
Display resolution230k1kClearer display (+229k dot)

Common features in the Canon XC10 and Sony S2000

 XC10 S2000 
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon XC10 provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") along with a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check out the Canon XC10 and Sony S2000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the XC10 versus the S2000.

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XC10 and S2000 is 54 and 93 respectively.

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XC10 and S2000.

All in all, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XC10 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon XC10 will resolve greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer XC10 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon XC10
Portrait photography with Sony S2000
50
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (1")
features face detection autofocus
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
has no RAW files
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Street photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Street photography camera
56
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
offers focus by touch
has no RAW files
heavier than competition (1,040g)
46
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon XC10
Sports photography with Sony S2000
47
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
features tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.8 fps)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
has no phase detect autofocus
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,200s)
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Travel photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Travel photography camera
43
offers focus by touch
really wide (24mm)
heavier than competition (1,040g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
50
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon XC10 Landscape photography factors
Sony S2000 Landscape photography factors
50
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12MP)
has no RAW files
27
screen size is good (3 inch)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon XC10 as a Vlogging camera
Sony S2000 as a Vlogging camera
28
really wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes external mic port
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
heavier than competition (1,040 grams)
21
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon XC10 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon XC10 and Sony S2000
 Canon XC10Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Company Canon Sony
Model type Canon XC10 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2015-04-08 2010-01-07
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC DV5 Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 12.8 x 9.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 122.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 20000 3200
Min native ISO 160 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-241mm (10.0x) 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing range 8cm 5cm
Crop factor 2.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1200 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.8fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.30 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video data format XF-AVC, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 1040 gr (2.29 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LP-E6N 2 x AA
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $1,599 $225