Canon XC10 vs Sony A35
54 Imaging
43 Features
60 Overall
49
69 Imaging
55 Features
70 Overall
61
Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 20000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-241mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 1040g - 125 x 102 x 122mm
- Launched April 2015
(Full Review)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon XC10 vs Sony A35, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Canon and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the XC10 (12MP) and A35 (16MP) and the XC10 (1") and A35 (APS-C) posses different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XC10 was released 3 years later than the A35 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon XC10 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XC10 matches up vs the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon XC10 & Sony SLT-A35. The complete galleries are available at Canon XC10 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon XC10 over the Sony A35
| XC10 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 | September 2011 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Canon XC10
| A35 | XC10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 1k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Canon XC10 and Sony A35
| XC10 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon XC10 has outside dimensions of 125mm x 102mm x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") having a weight of 1040 grams (2.29 lbs) while the Sony A35 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the XC10 vs the A35.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XC10 and A35 is 54 and 69 respectively.
Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XC10 and A35.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XC10 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A35 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent XC10 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon XC10 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Canon XC10 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon XC10 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2015-04-08 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC DV5 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 12.8 x 9.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 122.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 20000 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-241mm (10.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (120p, 100p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | XF-AVC, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1040g (2.29 lbs) | 415g (0.91 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 102 x 122mm (4.9" x 4.0" x 4.8") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E6N | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | CFast, SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,599 | $598 |