Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S205EXR
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and S200EXR (1/1.6") come with different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-10 was announced 4 years after the S200EXR which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-10 scores versus the S200EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 53 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-10
| S200EXR | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-10 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-10 comes with outside measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the FujiFilm S200EXR has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 versus the S200EXR.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and S200EXR is 83 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and S200EXR.
As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 features the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field tougher. The more recent EX-10 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Also referred to as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 7.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | NP-140 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $456 | $500 |