Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75375/7537523d320c2bfccd4e37a12f883cfcd9ded6c0" alt="Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc986/fc98613a0c5c7cfe89728f847caea86bac881705" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD front FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD front"
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2900HD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-10 and FujiFilm S2800HD, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the S2800HD (14MP) is pretty similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and S2800HD (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-10 was announced 3 years after the S2800HD which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-10 grades vs the S2800HD when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
EX-10 | S2800HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 47 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Casio EX-10
S2800HD | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and FujiFilm S2800HD
EX-10 | S2800HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 has got outside dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the FujiFilm S2800HD has specifications of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 and FujiFilm S2800HD in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 versus the S2800HD.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f60c3/f60c313d3856ed8344444d1cf7d8ea8bd87cfd01" alt="Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD size comparison Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and S2800HD is 83 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/909ac/909acddf5fa6a33ce19821f717c7e96a6b3b5f0b" alt="Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and S2800HD.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the FujiFilm S2800HD will deliver extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7898/e7898d28833d7c22e459e16f5cd35b1784fa6d71" alt="Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daeca/daecaede8bccfc5f17f43dd320f102a8d84a9f70" alt="Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs FujiFilm S2800HD Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD |
Alternate name | - | FinePix S2900HD |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-11-14 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 99% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lb) | 437 grams (0.96 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-130A | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $456 | $260 |