Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") come with different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-10 was launched 4 years later than the Fujifilm F200EXR and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-10 scores against the Fujifilm F200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | April 2009 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-10
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-10 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 offers exterior dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-10 compared to the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 83 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The EX-10 has the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field harder. The more recent EX-10 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-10 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 250 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $456 | $350 |