Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
![Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-10/Casio-EX-10-front.jpg)
![Kodak EasyShare M580 front Kodak EasyShare M580 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-M580.jpg)
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Launched July 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the M580 (14MP) is relatively close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and M580 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The EX-10 was manufactured 4 years after the M580 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-10 matches up versus the M580 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Kodak EasyShare M580. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Kodak M580
EX-10 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Casio EX-10
M580 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Kodak M580
EX-10 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 has exterior dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Kodak M580 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 versus the M580.
![Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M580-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and M580 is 83 and 90 respectively.
![Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M580-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and M580.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Kodak M580 will result in greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger EX-10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M580-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Kodak-EasyShare-M580-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak M580 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-07-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $456 | $169 |