Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is relatively close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and Z915 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-10 was revealed 4 years later than the Z915 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-10 scores versus the Z915 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Kodak Z915
| EX-10 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 60 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Casio EX-10
| Z915 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Kodak Z915
| EX-10 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-10 has physical measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-10 versus Kodak Z915 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-10 and the Z915.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and Z915 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The graphic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and Z915.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-10 will result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern EX-10 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-10 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $456 | $200 |
