Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
![Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-10/Casio-EX-10-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-800-UZ/Olympus-SP-800-UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Announced February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX-10 was manufactured 3 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-10 grades against the SP-800 UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
EX-10 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 47 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Casio EX-10
SP-800 UZ | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
EX-10 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 has got exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 against the SP-800 UZ.
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and SP-800 UZ is 83 and 69 respectively.
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will offer you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-11-14 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 12 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $456 | $270 |