Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48


89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched July 2011

Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus SZ-11, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is very comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and SZ-11 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

The EX-10 was manufactured 2 years later than the SZ-11 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-10 grades against the SZ-11 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus SZ-11. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus SZ-11
EX-10 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 29 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Casio EX-10
SZ-11 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus SZ-11
EX-10 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 has got external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-11 has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus SZ-11 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-10 against the SZ-11.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and SZ-11 is 83 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and SZ-11.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus SZ-11 will show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer EX-10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-10 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus SZ-11 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 250s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 226 gr (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 images | 200 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-130A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $456 | $253 |