Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-10 and Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-10 was brought out 3 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-10 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-10 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 47 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-10
| Tough-3000 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-10 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 comes with outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-10 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-10 vs the Tough-3000.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and Tough-3000 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and Tough-3000.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor sizes. The EX-10 features the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The more modern EX-10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Other name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $456 | $0 |