Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010
83 Imaging
36 Features
65 Overall
47
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is pretty close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and 8010 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-10 was introduced 3 years later than the 8010 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-10 matches up vs the 8010 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus 8010
| EX-10 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | February 2010 | More recent by 47 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Casio EX-10
| 8010 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus 8010
| EX-10 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 offers physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-10 and the 8010.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and 8010 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and 8010.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus 8010 will result in more detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger EX-10 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $456 | $600 |