Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-10 was manufactured 10 months later than the XZ-10 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-10 matches up versus the XZ-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus XZ-10
| EX-10 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 10 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Casio EX-10
| XZ-10 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus XZ-10
| EX-10 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 has got exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-10 and the XZ-10.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and XZ-10 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and XZ-10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-10 offers the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field easier. The younger EX-10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-130A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $456 | $428 |