Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TG-810 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-10 was announced 2 years after the TG-810 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-10 matches up against the TG-810 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 28 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+2k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-10
| TG-810 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 comes with outer measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-10 compared to the TG-810.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and TG-810 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and TG-810.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-810 will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $456 | $428 |