Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Pentax Optio WG-2 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Pentax WG-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
  • Released February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was introduced 8 years prior to the WG-2 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the WG-2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax WG-2

 E-300 WG-2 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-300

 WG-2 E-300 
ReleasedFebruary 2012January 2005More modern by 86 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kCrisper display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2

 E-300 WG-2 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the WG-2.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and WG-2 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and WG-2.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 will resolve extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Pentax WG-2 Portrait photography factors
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
40
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Pentax WG-2 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
54
environment proofing
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Pentax WG-2 Sports photography details
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
38
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Pentax WG-2 Travel photography features
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
70
environment proofing
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Pentax WG-2
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse function
47
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Pentax WG-2 Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
30
pretty wide (28mm)
includes face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
no mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2
 Olympus E-300Pentax Optio WG-2
General Information
Company Olympus Pentax
Model Olympus E-300 Pentax Optio WG-2
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2005-01-10 2012-02-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 5.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 192 grams (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $800 $350