Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53f79/53f79318b036268028db17024c8c792be3aa6f4f" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 front Pentax Optio WG-2 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and WG-2 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and WG-2 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-300 was introduced 8 years prior to the WG-2 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the WG-2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Pentax Optio WG-2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax WG-2
E-300 | WG-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus E-300
WG-2 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 86 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2
E-300 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Pentax WG-2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the WG-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/649ac/649acb942a4858eb6e1ff831928fc8546c50b72a" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and WG-2 is 67 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a3f5/0a3f5c0e6ce7052c57796370eeb5dec91e1db3c9" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The pic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and WG-2.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 will resolve extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8224/e8224598f4795ae4fc775fa9a26958d183195711" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1603b/1603b11767e771e45aa6ef6f2c8a3d25f2f8b13d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $350 |