Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
Portability
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-10 was introduced 19 months later than the TG-1 iHS which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-10 scores versus the TG-1 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 19 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 610k | Sharper screen (+312k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Casio EX-10
| TG-1 iHS | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| EX-10 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 has got exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-10 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and TG-1 iHS is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The graphic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and TG-1 iHS.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-10 has got the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The younger EX-10 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-10 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-1 iHS Portrait photography advice
you can focus manually
provides face detection focus
exports RAW formats
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
offers face detection focus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-10 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-1 iHS Street photography highlights
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
includes focus by touch
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
heavier than others in class (384g)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-10
Sports photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery power (455 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
good battery (350 per charge)
max fps low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Casio EX-10 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Travel photography camera
good battery power (455 per charge)
includes focus by touch
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
heavier than others in class (384g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
good battery (350 per charge)
weather proofing
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-10 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography info
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (455 CIPA)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
good battery (350 per charge)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-10 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging advice
relatively wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than others in class (384 grams)
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone jack
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | 350 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $456 | $399 |