Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-10 was brought out 5 months after the TG-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-10 scores vs the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 610k | Clearer display (+312k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Casio EX-10
| TG-2 iHS | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-10 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | June 2013 | Similar age | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-10 compared to the TG-2 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and TG-2 iHS is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizes. The EX-10 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field easier.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $456 | $380 |