Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and VH-410 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-10 was announced 15 months after the VH-410 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-10 grades versus the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus VH-410
| EX-10 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2013 |  | August 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-10
| VH-410 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VH-410
| EX-10 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 provides outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VH-410 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 and the VH-410.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and VH-410 is 83 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and VH-410.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VH-410 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $456 | $186 |