Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
![Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-10/Casio-EX-10-front.jpg)
![Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VH-410/Olympus-VH-410-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and VH-410 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-10 was announced 15 months after the VH-410 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-10 grades versus the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus VH-410
EX-10 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-10
VH-410 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VH-410
EX-10 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 provides outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VH-410 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 and the VH-410.
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-VH-410-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and VH-410 is 83 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-VH-410-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and VH-410.
As you can tell, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VH-410 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-VH-410-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-10-vs-Olympus-VH-410-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VH-410 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 152g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-130A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $456 | $186 |