Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty close but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and VR-330 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-10 was released 2 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-10 scores against the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 34 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-10
| VR-330 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-10 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 offers outer measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 vs the VR-330.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and VR-330 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and VR-330.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger EX-10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $456 | $220 |
