Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-10 versus Panasonic FH22, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Panasonic. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is pretty similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and FH22 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-10 was released 3 years after the FH22 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-10 grades versus the FH22 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Panasonic FH22
| EX-10 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 47 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Casio EX-10
| FH22 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Panasonic FH22
| EX-10 | FH22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 features outer measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Panasonic FH22 has proportions of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-10 versus Panasonic FH22 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 vs the FH22.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and FH22 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and FH22.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FH22 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern EX-10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-10 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Panasonic |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
| Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 170g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $456 | $200 |