Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3
83 Imaging
38 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-10 was introduced 4 months later than the WG-3 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-10 grades against the WG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Pentax WG-3. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-10 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-10
| WG-3 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Pentax WG-3
| EX-10 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | July 2013 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 has outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-10 compared to the WG-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WG-3 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and WG-3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 will result in more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $456 | $300 |
