Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-3 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-10 was introduced 4 months later than the WG-3 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-10 grades against the WG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Pentax WG-3. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Pentax WG-3
| EX-10 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Casio EX-10
| WG-3 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Pentax WG-3
| EX-10 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | July 2013 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 has outer dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-3 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-10 compared to the WG-3.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WG-3 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and WG-3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax WG-3 will result in more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-10 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $456 | $300 |