Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- New Model is Ricoh GR II
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and GR (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-10 was unveiled 8 months after the GR so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-10 scores against the GR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh GR
EX-10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | April 2013 | More modern by 8 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-10
GR | EX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 922k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh GR
EX-10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-10 has got physical measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 against the GR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and GR is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and GR.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will show extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger EX-10 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 300 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.90 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 shots | 290 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-130A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $456 | $971 |