Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75375/7537523d320c2bfccd4e37a12f883cfcd9ded6c0" alt="Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8efd8/8efd898509fb7501a03567626407f89aba70311a" alt="Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front"
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-10 was revealed 3 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-10 grades vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-10 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | September 2010 | More modern by 39 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-10
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-10 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 features exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4856/f4856437820ab653784287d86d0d9489246123ed" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 83 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/828da/828dacf42a77b4e02d014b647f394c87264210b2" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor sizes. The EX-10 offers the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field more difficult. The more recent EX-10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faf12/faf1203d0d321e26cb8cbb2f87f41bd98424b8e1" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dea6f/dea6f35ef197ea79af92518d6a4be75d9205fd35" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 250 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 140g (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 shots | 320 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-130A | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $456 | $566 |