Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and PX (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and PX (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-10 was introduced 2 years after the PX which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-10 matches up vs the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh PX
| EX-10 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 28 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-10
| PX | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh PX
| EX-10 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 has got physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 compared to the PX.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and PX is 83 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and PX.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh PX will provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 156 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $456 | $329 |