Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-10 was launched 2 months before the WG-4 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-10 matches up versus the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-10
| WG-4 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 | February 2014 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 offers outer measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-10 compared to the WG-4.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WG-4 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | 240 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $456 | $330 |