Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-10 was launched 2 months before the WG-4 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-10 matches up versus the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-10
| WG-4 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-10 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 | February 2014 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 offers outer measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-10 compared to the WG-4.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WG-4 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | 240 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $456 | $330 |