Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and DV300F (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-10 was introduced 23 months after the DV300F making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-10 grades against the DV300F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Samsung DV300F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung DV300F
| EX-10 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 23 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-10
| DV300F | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung DV300F
| EX-10 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 offers outside measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-10 versus the DV300F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and DV300F is 83 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and DV300F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Samsung DV300F will deliver greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-10 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 250s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 133 gr (0.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $456 | $200 |