Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-10 and Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and MV800 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-10 was introduced 2 years after the MV800 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-10 grades vs the MV800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung MV800
| EX-10 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | September 2011 | Newer by 27 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Casio EX-10
| MV800 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung MV800
| EX-10 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 features exterior dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has sizing of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-10 and Samsung MV800 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-10 vs the MV800.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and MV800 is 83 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and MV800.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung MV800 will show greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer EX-10 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 121 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Micro SD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $456 | $499 |