Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and PL200 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-10 was manufactured 3 years after the PL200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-10 matches up vs the PL200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-10 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 41 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-10
| PL200 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung PL200
| EX-10 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-10 offers external dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung PL200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 versus the PL200.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and PL200 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and PL200.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung PL200 will show greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 170 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $456 | $0 |