Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is PL150
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TL210 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TL210 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-10 was manufactured 3 years after the TL210 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-10 grades vs the TL210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung TL210. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung TL210
| EX-10 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 47 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Casio EX-10
| TL210 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL210
| EX-10 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3.5" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 enjoys physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL210 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 against the TL210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and TL210 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and TL210.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor dimensions. The EX-10 features the larger sensor which will make getting bokeh simpler. The more modern EX-10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL210 |
| Other name | - | PL150 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 pounds) | 177g (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $456 | $230 |