Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-10 was brought out 4 years after the TL320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-10 matches up versus the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-10 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 58 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-10
| TL320 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL320
| EX-10 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 comes with exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-10 against the TL320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and TL320 is 83 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and TL320.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 offers the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The fresher EX-10 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $456 | $380 |