Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and TL320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-10 was brought out 4 years after the TL320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-10 matches up versus the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung TL320
| EX-10 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 58 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-10
| TL320 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL320
| EX-10 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-10 comes with exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-10 and Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-10 against the TL320.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and TL320 is 83 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and TL320.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 offers the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The fresher EX-10 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $456 | $380 |