Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75375/7537523d320c2bfccd4e37a12f883cfcd9ded6c0" alt="Casio Exilim EX-10 front Casio Exilim EX-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WB30F (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-10 was manufactured 11 months later than the WB30F which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-10 scores vs the WB30F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-10 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 11 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-10
WB30F | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB30F
EX-10 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-10 has got exterior dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 against the WB30F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e2b5/5e2b55b4e4b0ff51b26f1228b1c61e961aa5b3b0" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WB30F is 83 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b89c0/b89c003a97b488c3a233f3ad13843794c228d4ff" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and WB30F.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB30F will produce more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent EX-10 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f33e4/f33e4919d6da041ab2a8b14c280dad992533add3" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9045/b90453292fa7721e7d713e1abc0e77ffd9a9d4a2" alt="Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $456 | $180 |