Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-10 was released around the same time to the WB50F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-10 matches up versus the WB50F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-10
| WB50F | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 comes with physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 against the WB50F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WB50F is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and WB50F.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB50F will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $456 | $180 |