Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung WB50F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WB50F (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-10 was released around the same time to the WB50F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-10 matches up versus the WB50F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-10
| WB50F | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2013 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 comes with physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 against the WB50F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and WB50F is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and WB50F.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB50F will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots more aggressively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $456 | $180 |