Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-10 was introduced 11 months later than the WB800F and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-10 grades vs the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung WB800F
EX-10 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | January 2013 | More recent by 11 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-10
WB800F | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung WB800F
EX-10 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 enjoys physical measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-10 versus the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and WB800F is 83 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The visual here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-10 and WB800F.
All in all, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-10 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung WB800F will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $456 | $300 |