Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48


86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Introduced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Older Model is Sigma DP2s

Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and DP2x (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

The EX-10 was released 2 years later than the DP2x and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-10 scores against the DP2x when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Sigma DP2x. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Sigma DP2x
EX-10 | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 34 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Casio EX-10
DP2x | EX-10 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Sigma DP2x
EX-10 | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 has physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Sigma DP2x has measurements of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-10 versus the DP2x.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-10 and DP2x is 83 and 86 respectively.

Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and DP2x.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-10 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-10 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-10 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Sigma DP2x |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-11-14 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 384 grams (0.85 pounds) | 280 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-130A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $456 | $699 |