Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0193b60bb5af18fb50aecee2d917106dd57089" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front Casio Exilim EX-FS10 front"
96 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-7.1) lens
- 121g - 102 x 55 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-100 and Casio EX-FS10, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are sold by Casio. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and EX-FS10 (9MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and EX-FS10 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-100 was brought out 5 years later than the EX-FS10 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-FS10 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-100 matches up vs the EX-FS10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Casio Exilim EX-FS10. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Casio EX-FS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Casio EX-FS10
EX-100 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 62 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FS10 over the Casio EX-100
EX-FS10 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Casio EX-FS10
EX-100 | EX-FS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-100 comes with exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-FS10 has specifications of 102mm x 55mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-100 and Casio EX-FS10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-100 versus the EX-FS10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c97dd/c97dd7a07907313909a923a1ed29b1284ab12804" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and EX-FS10 is 83 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18b56/18b56edba9d55caebd10e34685a822a4d54027ae" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and EX-FS10.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-100 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Casio EX-100 will provide you with more detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger EX-100 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2676/f26760786dc1a3240c8f5e6ee706ab11d1b2cf64" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f1a2/2f1a22c13b7dfb1fd372d36a12977fb0eec05946" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Casio EX-FS10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Casio Exilim EX-FS10 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.9-7.1 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.10 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 102 x 55 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | NP-80 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $572 | $200 |