Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
65 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-100 was announced very close to the Astro Zoom AZ651 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-100 being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-100 scores vs the Astro Zoom AZ651 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| EX-100 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Clearer display (+2k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Casio EX-100
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| EX-100 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2014 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 provides physical measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has sizing of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-100 against the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 83 and 65 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and Astro Zoom AZ651.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will produce extra detail with its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively.
Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 21 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 gr (0.86 lbs) | 567 gr (1.25 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $572 | $419 |