Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83032/830322c2f55e8e7b440b8ff2f88d5aa93903532c" alt="Casio Exilim EX-100 front Casio Exilim EX-100 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52707/52707e8927a13c2936528cbc3e374df7d981df72" alt="Nikon Coolpix S5200 front Nikon Coolpix S5200 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-156mm (F) lens
- 146g - 98 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Casio EX-100 and Nikon S5200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and S5200 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and S5200 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-100 was launched 13 months after the S5200 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-100 scores against the S5200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Nikon Coolpix S5200. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Nikon S5200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Nikon S5200
EX-100 | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S5200 over the Casio EX-100
S5200 | EX-100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Nikon S5200
EX-100 | S5200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-100 comes with outer measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Nikon S5200 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-100 and Nikon S5200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-100 and the S5200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8431/a8431aa175c29200c29a30863f4526a96c47e57e" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and S5200 is 83 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/535ec/535ec153c0f578c647b06faaa3c18fd82a2ff464" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-100 and S5200.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-100 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Nikon S5200 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-100 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/402b6/402b605745c351975193325aac1919676d962985" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 sensor size comparison Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac1f6/ac1f69852e33d0bc2bebcaf6f62104ded2c1d12e" alt="Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-100 vs Nikon S5200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-100 | Nikon Coolpix S5200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Nikon Coolpix S5200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-06 | 2013-01-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 26-156mm (6.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | Super Clear LCD | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.10 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 389g (0.86 lb) | 146g (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 98 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 160 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $572 | $130 |