Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio EX-100 and Olympus FE-5020, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the FE-5020 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and FE-5020 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was brought out 4 years later than the FE-5020 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-100 scores against the FE-5020 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Olympus FE-5020. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-100 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 56 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-100
| FE-5020 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-100 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 features exterior dimensions of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-100 and Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-100 and the FE-5020.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-100 and FE-5020 is 83 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-100 and FE-5020.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact MP but different sensor measurements. The EX-100 has the larger sensor which will make obtaining bokeh less difficult. The more recent EX-100 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also referred to as | - | X-935 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-02-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/20000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lb) | 137 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $572 | $160 |