Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Superseded the Olympus SH-2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and SH-3 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-100 was revealed 24 months before the SH-3 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-100 scores vs the SH-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus SH-3
| EX-100 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Casio EX-100
| SH-3 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | February 2014 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus SH-3
| EX-100 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 has got outer measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-100 vs the SH-3.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-100 and SH-3 is 83 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specs. The graphic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and SH-3.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-100 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-02-06 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 11.5 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.10 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | 380 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $572 | $579 |