Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000
83 Imaging
37 Features
64 Overall
47
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus 6000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-100 (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is very comparable but the EX-100 (1/1.7") and 6000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-100 was launched 4 years later than the 6000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-100 grades against the 6000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-100 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-100 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Olympus 6000
| EX-100 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 57 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Casio EX-100
| 6000 | EX-100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Olympus 6000
| EX-100 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-100 enjoys physical measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-100 versus Olympus 6000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-100 compared to the 6000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and 6000 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and 6000.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-100 featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Casio EX-100 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent EX-100 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-100 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-06 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389g (0.86 pounds) | 179g (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $572 | $259 |